August 4th, 2009
It’s a win for everyone when you find the kind of organization in which your talents can flourish.
But we live in a working-world filled with changes:
1. A CEO may decide it’s more profitable to become a manufacturing-focused company than a sales & marketing-driven organization.
2. Mergers and acquisitions create new cultures. New cultures lead to new values and priorities.
3. Customers change their technology, causing your company to change it’s tech service response.
4. Downsizing. Fewer people, more responsibilities for those remaining.
What Happened to the Talent?
I’ve watched each of the above grow into a crisis of confidence for employees and employers:
- Mysteriously, you don’t feel as talented and capable as before.
- At the same time, the organization is wondering where it’s talented people went.
Fact: no one suddenly got stupid!
Second fact: Something else will now need to change.
You or Them?
When you were hired it was a good fit because of how business was conducted. Now it doesn’t seem that way. Here are some considerations when companies and employees find themselves in a talent mismatch as a result of changes:
1. Companies: Take time to assess the breadth of talent that exists in your employee base. You may not have been using the range of talents that individuals possess because you (naturally) hired on a given set of criteria.
Real-life example: In the past few years I’ve had the opportunity to assess three executives who were on the “We’ve changed, their role isn’t needed, I guess they have to go even though they’ve been really effective” list. In two of the three cases a broader assessment showed that they were gifted in areas that hadn’t been tapped before. Those two remain with their organizations in new roles and are contributing meaningfully and productively.
2. Individuals. Maybe it isn’t such a good fit.The faster you figure out the reality of the situation the faster you can make a decision to stay or look elsewhere.
Bonus tip: The longer you hang out in a mismatch the more you will question your adequacy. So, knock it off! You are talented and you’ve been performing in a talented way. The situation changed, not you. Get yourself into another winning situation before you conclude that the problem is you.
A Final Thought
Our educational and career counseling entities need to become very deliberate in painting an accurate picture of “careers.”
My take is that the approach is still, “What will you do when you grow up?”, the assumption being that one will “become something” and “do it at a company” for a lifetime. The reality is that a person needs to find out their range of talents and prepare for a series of long-term projects in multiple places vs. lifetime employment.
Building awareness of talents, project orientation, and transitions would go a long way in offering genuine help in accurately preparing young people for the future.
What do you think?
from: Steve Roesler @www.allthingsworkplace.com/
No Comments »
May 28th, 2009
A best-selling book published in three languages—it is, at its core, a guidebook on understanding human thinking and behavior. Written by Dr. Geil Browning, the book is based on the Emergenetics concepts and theory, through the scientific approach with extensive data by measuring and analyzing the way people think, behave and interact. [afternote: As of year 2007, more than 280,000 people from all over the world have generated sufficient data to allow each test to be scored against the population and gender norms (Emergenetics Asia, 2007)]
The book applies Dr. Browning’s extensive research on brain-based science, psychometric assessments, learning and organizational development to provide a clear resource for self-awareness and understanding and a knowledgebase to relate to others in work, home and daily life. The Emergenetics framework pinpoints the complex interaction of our genetics and life experiences in an easy-to-understand format that is relatable and applicable across situation, profession and culture.
The book approaches success by relying on the proven science behind and application of the Emergenetics Model. Emergenetics measures the way people prefer to think in four distinct attributes—Analytical, Structural, Social, and Conceptual; it also measures behavioral preferences in three attributes—Expressiveness, Assertiveness and Flexibility.
Emergenetics provides a unique depiction of the way people approach themselves and others. The book takes this depiction one step further, with in-depth analysis of everyday situations and case studies about how preferences play out in the real world, all done in a style that appeals to every mode of thinking and preference.
The book also provides a powerful Toolbox to approach everyday situations with Emergenetics. Especially appreciate the great write-up on principles of inclusivity and appreciation for others—how to run a successful meeting that appeals to all thinking and behavioral styles, how to provide feedback in a way that motivates rather than tears down, creative approaches to presenting, how to approach financial and business decisions with your own strengths in mind, and more.
In relation to creativity, Dr Browning suggested that it is not a matter of whether one is creative or not, but rather, how creative one can be. “There are limitless ways to be creative, and there is no one Profile that has a monopoly on creativity!” I particularly appreciate the flexibility of allowing one to think/express creatively. Below is an extraction from the book that perceives different ways of creativity of the different minds:
• Analytical brain is being creative when it asks, “How could I design a system for this?”
• Structural brain is being creative when it asks, “How could I organize this?”
• Social brain is being creative when it asks, “Could I throw a party about this?”
• Conceptual mind is being creative when it asks, “How could I paint a picture of this?”
She noted that people with different profiles will approach the same creative task differently. One of the most delightful chapters for me was her interview with 2 different artists- one who does colorful, abstract paintings, and another who paints with meticulous details of still life. She pointed that just as there are many ways to paint a picture, so there are different ways to express creativity.
Dr Browning recommended that people ought to constantly seek novelty and creativity through lifelong learning as the key to keep a mental edge. I quote, “Novelty – taking risks, questioning assumptions, being exposed to new ideas, and trying something new each day- keeps the brain active.” (p. 252). Besides suggesting how the different profiles can be more creative, she also cited the study of the activities carried out by 740 members of the Catholic clergy for an average of 4.5 years. Through the research, it was proven that cognitive activity is protected against Alzheimer’s disease (Wilson et al., 2002).
Most importantly, thebook offers applicability out of theory. By introducing brain science and research and segueing into a substantial background on the Emergenetics Model and Profile, the book builds a foundation, and utilizes that foundation to develop clear-cut ways to apply Emergenetics learnings into problem-solving, leadership, teamwork and other elements proven to create success in workplace and life as a whole.
Emergenetics has fostered a deeper awareness of my thinking preferences and expressed behavior. I believe with more applications of this knowledge, it will enhance my capacity as a leader especially in communication and building stronger win-win interpersonal relations especially when I understand the different preferences of my charges. The creative process could benefit from such an environment as I am better able to harness people’s thinking and behavioral attributes, and effectively develop a team that complements their preferred styles.
This article was found in: Creativity Research
No Comments »